linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] perf,x86: PEBS/BTS buffer allocation changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTimWd680ARZ=RUGC9qXpgzLE2fpr2NuQiCPbAHzH@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:45:41 +0200
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] perf,x86: PEBS/BTS buffer allocation changes

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 15:42 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> Hi Stephane,
>>
>> Your PEBS/BTS buffer patch failed a .config dependent build, which on its own
>> was rather easy to fix, but Ingo objected to the size of the patch and asked me
>> to rewrite in smaller increments. This patch series is the result.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> Stephane, can I get an ack/review tag for this?
>
At first glance, it looks okay, I will take a closer look this afternoon
and get back to you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/