lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinR1KiiTyR3zbOWXUcqXjdXFuv_tq21SXvWc2-X@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:30:30 +0200
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] perf,x86: PEBS/BTS buffer allocation changes

Works ok for me.

Acked-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>


On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 15:42 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> Hi Stephane,
>>
>> Your PEBS/BTS buffer patch failed a .config dependent build, which on its own
>> was rather easy to fix, but Ingo objected to the size of the patch and asked me
>> to rewrite in smaller increments. This patch series is the result.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> Stephane, can I get an ack/review tag for this?
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ