[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CC0AF9A.9050307@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:24:42 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: akataria@...are.com
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
Haren Myneni <hbabu@...ibm.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>,
"jeremy@...source.com" <jeremy@...source.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Bug during kexec...not all cpus are stopped
On 10/21/2010 02:10 PM, Alok Kataria wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 13:26 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 10/21/2010 12:09 PM, Alok Kataria wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think this patch was picked up for tip, now that the 2.6.37
>>> merge window is open can you please pick this up push it upstream.
>>> This patch fixes a legitimate regression, which was introduced during
>>> 2.6.30, by commit id 4ef702c10b5df18ab04921fc252c26421d4d6c75.
>>>
>>
>> It probably would have helped if the patch had had a proper patch header
>> and so on, and *in particular* not buried in a tree with [RFC PATCH].
>> RFC strongly implies that the patch is intended as a base for
>> discussion, and is explicitly not intended to be committed.
>
> I see, I have sent another mail with the patch.
>
I already took the patch and am running it through compile tests, but
that was mostly for future reference.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists