[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CC0B006.7040008@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:26:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: hold mm->page_table_lock while doing vmalloc_sync
On 10/21/2010 02:06 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Ping? Have you had any thoughts about possible x86-64 problems with this?
>
> Thanks,
> J
I didn't find any, so I already committed your patch to tip:x86/mm two
days ago.
Now, it's worth noting that Linus has asked us to get rid of
vmalloc_sync_all() completely, which would be a good thing in the longer
term.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists