[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CC1515E.6080006@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:54:54 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next regression: IO errors in with ext4 and xen-blkfront
On 2010-10-22 10:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> In the barriers tree Xen claims to support flushes, but I doesn't.
> It never handles REQ_FLUSH requests. Try commenting out the
>
> blk_queue_flush(info->rq, info->feature_flush);
>
> call and things should improve. I still need to hear back from Xen
> folks how to actually implement a cache flush - they only implement
> a barrier write privilegue which could never implement an empty
> cache flush. Up to current kernels that meant it would implement
> barrier writes with content correctly and silently ignore empty barriers
> leading to very interesting data integrity bugs. From 2.6.37 onwards
> it simply won't work anymore at all, which is at least consistent
> (modulo the bug of actually claiming to support flushes).
So how about we just disable barriers for Xen atm? I would really really
like to push that branch out as well now, since I'll be travelling for
most of the merge window this time.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists