linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] ACPI, APEI patches for 2.6.37

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1287737742.2862.241.camel@yhuang-dev>
Date:	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:55:42 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ACPI, APEI patches for 2.6.37

On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 13:50 +0800, Len Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Huang Ying wrote:
> 
> > [PATCH 2/9] Add lock-less version of bitmap_set/clear
> > [PATCH 3/9] lock-less NULL terminated single list implementation
> > [PATCH 4/9] lock-less general memory allocator
> 
> What kinds of tests has this lockless lib code been subject to?

These code are used by GHES only now. We have a test suite for GHES.
These code works well for GHES.

At the same time, we have test code dedicated for these lib too,
including stress testing.

> This is generic code, does it play on multiple architectures?

We have tested the code on x86_64 and i386 architectures. For some other
architectures, we have done compile testing. The code is quite simple,
so I think it should run properly on other architectures too.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/