[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CC1E610.4050605@fastmail.fm>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:29:20 +0100
From: Jack Stone <jwjstone@...tmail.fm>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>,
stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
600155@...s.debian.org, Jason Heeris <jason.heeris@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, spamalot@...peed.ch,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [11/17] r6040: Fix multicast list iteration when hash filter
is used
On 22/10/2010 20:23, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:13:27PM +0100, Jack Stone wrote:
>> On 22/10/2010 19:39, Greg KH wrote:
>>> drivers/net/r6040.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> --- a/drivers/net/r6040.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/r6040.c
>>> @@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ static void r6040_multicast_list(struct
>>> iowrite16(hash_table[3], ioaddr + MAR3);
>>> }
>>> /* Multicast Address 1~4 case */
>>> + dmi = dev->mc_list;
>>> for (i = 0, dmi; (i < dev->mc_count) && (i < MCAST_MAX); i++) {
>> Any reason for the dmi in the above line? As far as I can see it is a
>> nop.
>
> Look closer at the for loop please.
Maybe I'm missing something but:
for (i = 0, ---->dmi <----; (i < ...
The dmi here still doesn't seem to do anything?
Thanks,
Jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists