[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101023170328.GA21161@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:03:28 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Dr. Werner Fink" <werner@...e.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/49] tty: Add a new file /proc/tty/consoles
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 09:53:13AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 08:46:36AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 01:26:12PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 02:00:38PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Please, don't. Even leaving aside the fact that it's mind-bogglingly
> > > > > broken (->private_data can be _ANYTHING_, including arbitrary number cast
> > > > > to pointer), you really shouldn't screw your way through the descriptor
> > > > > table in the first place.
> > > > >
> > > > > Strongly NACKed.
> > > >
> > > > Well, our complains are -ETOOLATE -- it's commit f4a3e0bceb57466c
> > > > upstream. So please fix this up.
> > >
> > > FVO "fix" equal to "revert". Belated review:
> > >
> > > a) global variable depending on stdin of the last opener? Affecting
> > > output of read(2)? Really?
> > >
> > > b) iterator is broken; list should be locked in ->start(), unlocked
> > > in ->stop() and *NOT* unlocked/relocked in ->next()
> > >
> > > c) ->show() ought to do nothing in case of ->device == NULL, instead
> > > of skipping those in ->next()/->start()
> > >
> > > d) regardless of the merits of the bright idea about asterisk at that
> > > line in output *and* regardless of (a), the implementation is not only
> > > atrociously ugly, it's actually very likely to be a roothole. Verifying
> > > that Cthulhu knows what number happens to be address of a tty_struct by
> > > blindly dereferencing memory at that address... Ouch.
> > >
> > > Please revert that crap.
> >
> > I'll revert it and send the pull request to Linus.
>
> Odd:
> > git revert f4a3e0bceb57466c
> Finished one revert.
> # On branch master
> nothing to commit (working directory clean)
>
> Um, what just happened, I don't seem to be able to revert this patch.
> Did something change with git revert recently? I'm using:
> > git --version
> git version 1.7.2
>
> Any ideas?
Ah, it's because Linus already reverted it. Odd that git didn't tell me
that somehow.
Anyway, all is good now, sorry for the noise.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists