[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101023134742.218ae337.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:47:42 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the ext4 tree
Hi Ted,
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:04:10 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c between commit 9c543072a9dd7cf60cbf472914a6480ffda50b27
> ("ext4: Check for negative error code from sb_issue_discard") from the
> ext4 tree and commit 2cf6d26a354ab6362e301b5a323832b02867df47 ("block:
> pass gfp_mask and flags to sb_issue_discard") from the block tree.
>
> Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
>
> diff --cc fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index e4f4dae,19aa0d4..0000000
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@@ -2612,8 -2566,8 +2612,8 @@@ static inline void ext4_issue_discard(s
> discard_block = block + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, block_group);
> trace_ext4_discard_blocks(sb,
> (unsigned long long) discard_block, count);
> - ret = sb_issue_discard(sb, discard_block, count);
> + ret = sb_issue_discard(sb, discard_block, count, GFP_NOFS, 0);
> - if (ret == EOPNOTSUPP) {
> + if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> ext4_warning(sb, "discard not supported, disabling");
> clear_opt(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_opt, DISCARD);
> }
This merge fix will now be necessary when merging with Linus' current tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists