[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100921140410.f1ba148e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:04:10 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the ext4 tree
Hi Jens,
Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
fs/ext4/mballoc.c between commit 9c543072a9dd7cf60cbf472914a6480ffda50b27
("ext4: Check for negative error code from sb_issue_discard") from the
ext4 tree and commit 2cf6d26a354ab6362e301b5a323832b02867df47 ("block:
pass gfp_mask and flags to sb_issue_discard") from the block tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index e4f4dae,19aa0d4..0000000
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@@ -2612,8 -2566,8 +2612,8 @@@ static inline void ext4_issue_discard(s
discard_block = block + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, block_group);
trace_ext4_discard_blocks(sb,
(unsigned long long) discard_block, count);
- ret = sb_issue_discard(sb, discard_block, count);
+ ret = sb_issue_discard(sb, discard_block, count, GFP_NOFS, 0);
- if (ret == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
ext4_warning(sb, "discard not supported, disabling");
clear_opt(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_opt, DISCARD);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists