lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:04:32 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/21] fs: Protect inode->i_state with the inode->i_lock

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 08:17:35PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> 	* call in ext2_remount() is hogwash - we do that with at least
> root inode pinned down, so it will fail, along with the remount attempt.

And having it fail is a good thing.  XIP mode means different file and
address_space operations, which we don't even try to deal with right
now.  Not allowing transitions from/to it is the right thing.

> 	* smb reconnect logics.  AFAICS, that's complete crap; we *never*
> retain inodes on smbfs.  IOW, nothing for invalidate_inodes() to do, other
> than evict fsnotify marks.  Which is to say, we are calling the wrong
> function there, even assuming that fsnotify should try to work there.

I don't think it should mess with fsnotify.  fsnotify_unmount_inodes
assumes it's only called on umount right now, and sends umount
notifications to userspace (see my mail from a few days ago).  So if
you split invalidate_inodes it really should only go into the umount
one.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists