[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinhODbKSMiwau0zRZw+5O+DPBo5UwpxM4q+Ytjb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 13:47:23 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT] trivial
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> please pull from 'for-next' branch at
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jikos/trivial.git for-next
Pulled. With one modification: I didn't take the top merge commit.
I _really_ prefer to see the clashes myself, and the extra merges just
make history less readable. So if the conflicts are trivial, please
don't pre-merge stuff - it just hides things from me.
Now, admittedly the things it hides shouldn't matter for something
like the trivial tree, but at the same time, exactly because it's the
trivial tree I would also expect the conflicts to be really trivial,
so I'd rather just have people follow the general rule of "please
don't pre-merge" regardless.
It's a good idea to perhaps do a private merge just to see how nasty
things are, and to perhaps give me a heads-up (and maybe even export
the pre-merged thing as a "btw, if you're lazy and don't care about
the conflicts, you can pull this other pre-merged branch" branch). But
on the whole, I tend to find the conflicts to be the most telling
parts of any merge, and be a good hint about what development trees
clashed with each other.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists