linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/14] drivers/net/sb1000.c: delete double assignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010261423070.25281@ask.diku.dk>
Date:	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:25:14 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To:	walter harms <wharms@....de>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/14] drivers/net/sb1000.c: delete double assignment

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, walter harms wrote:

> 
> 
> Julia Lawall schrieb:
> > From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> > 
> > The other code around these duplicated assignments initializes the 0 1 2
> > and 3 elements of an array, so change the initialization of the
> > rx_session_id array to do the same.
> > 
> > A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
> > follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> > 
> > // <smpl>
> > @@
> > expression i;
> > @@
> > 
> > *i = ...;
> >  i = ...;
> > // </smpl>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> > 
> > ---
> > This changes the semantics and has not been tested.
> > 
> >  drivers/net/sb1000.c |    6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/sb1000.c b/drivers/net/sb1000.c
> > index a9ae505..66c2f1a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/sb1000.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/sb1000.c
> > @@ -961,9 +961,9 @@ sb1000_open(struct net_device *dev)
> >  	lp->rx_error_count = 0;
> >  	lp->rx_error_dpc_count = 0;
> >  	lp->rx_session_id[0] = 0x50;
> > -	lp->rx_session_id[0] = 0x48;
> > -	lp->rx_session_id[0] = 0x44;
> > -	lp->rx_session_id[0] = 0x42;
> > +	lp->rx_session_id[1] = 0x48;
> > +	lp->rx_session_id[2] = 0x44;
> > +	lp->rx_session_id[3] = 0x42;
> >  	lp->rx_frame_id[0] = 0;
> >  	lp->rx_frame_id[1] = 0;
> >  	lp->rx_frame_id[2] = 0;
> > 
> 
> /me is surprised that this did not cause more problems.
> Is it needed at all ?

The field appears to be useful.  However, there is an ioctl that also 
initializes the elements of this field with these values and that is 
implemented correctly.  Perhaps that was sufficient to hide the problem in 
practice.

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/