[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288115334.3530.7.camel@mothafucka.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:48:54 -0200
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Cédric Schieli <cschieli@...il.com>,
Eelco Dolstra <e.dolstra@...elft.nl>,
Olivier Hanesse <olivier.hanesse@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pvclock-xen: zero last_value on resume
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 09:59 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the
> system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller
> value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore).
> Make sure we zero last_value in that case so that the domain
> continues to see clock updates.
>
> [ I don't know if kvm needs an analogous fix or not. ]
After migration, save/restore, etc, we issue an ioctl where we tell
the host the last clock value. That (in theory) guarantees monotonicity.
I am not opposed to this patch in any way, however.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists