linux-kernel - Re: nfsd changes for 2.6.37

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:46:48 -0400
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfsd changes for 2.6.37

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:39:41AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> But even that kind of "both non-merged and pre-merged" pull requests
> should be reserved just for cases where there really was a somewhat
> involved conflict. For trivial conflicts like a feature removal doc
> clash, don't even bother.  I do several trivial merges a day, it's
> normal and it doesn't really take me any appreciable extra time. Git
> command line of the day:
> 
>   git log --oneline v2.6.36.. --merges --author=Torvalds --grep=onflict
> 
> to see at least a partial list of the trivial conflicts I've done in
> just this merge window. It's 3-4 per day, it's perfectly normal.

Makes sense, thanks!

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/