[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <008e01cb7569$8a01a2d0$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:57:22 +0900
From: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
To: "Jean Delvare" <khali@...ux-fr.org>, "Wang Qi" <qi.wang@...el.com>,
"Wang Yong Y" <yong.y.wang@...el.com>
Cc: "Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"Wolfram Sang" <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
"Ralf Baechle" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ben Dooks " <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
"srinidhi kasagar" <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
"Tomoya MORINAGA" <morinaga526@....okisemi.com>,
<kok.howg.ewe@...el.com>, <joel.clark@...el.com>,
<andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Topcliff: Update PCH_I2C driver to 2.6.36
On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:26 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> It's not mandatory, but the time Ben and myself have to review new
> drivers is scarce, so it's in your own interest to have the code
> reviewed by people with more time and more interest in the specific
> hardware. I can only imagine that Intel wants Topcliff to be supported
> as soon as possible by the Linux kernel, so they should certainly have
> resources to allocate for the review and testing.
I see.
I will reuest Intel to review again and put signature.
> Hi Qi and Yong Y
Could you review this patch again and put signature?
Thanks, Tomoya(OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean Delvare" <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
Cc: "Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>; "Wolfram Sang" <w.sang@...gutronix.de>; "Ralf Baechle"
<ralf@...ux-mips.org>; <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>; "LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; "Ben Dooks "
<ben-linux@...ff.org>; "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>; "srinidhi kasagar"
<srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>; "Tomoya MORINAGA" <morinaga526@....okisemi.com>; "Wang Qi" <qi.wang@...el.com>; "Wang
Yong Y" <yong.y.wang@...el.com>; <kok.howg.ewe@...el.com>; <joel.clark@...el.com>; <andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Topcliff: Update PCH_I2C driver to 2.6.36
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:47:37 +0900, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:13 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > The _pch becomes redundant then, i2c-topcliff.c would be enough, but
> > > both are fine with me, as my initial concern is gone.
> > I agree.
> > I will modify to "i2c-topcliff.c".
> >
> > > There's no Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Signed-off-by from anyone at Intel
> > > in the patch you posted.
> > Must we get Intel's signature ?
> > We have already got the following. Isn't this enough ?
> > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
> >
> > Though I haven't heard like the requirement,
> > if Intel's signature is mandatory, I will request to Intel.
>
> It's not mandatory, but the time Ben and myself have to review new
> drivers is scarce, so it's in your own interest to have the code
> reviewed by people with more time and more interest in the specific
> hardware. I can only imagine that Intel wants Topcliff to be supported
> as soon as possible by the Linux kernel, so they should certainly have
> resources to allocate for the review and testing.
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists