[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101029122534.d4d6a439.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:25:34 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: <michael.hennerich@...log.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
device-drivers-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org, drivers@...log.com,
rpurdie@...ux.intel.com, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: backlight: adp8870: Fix warn_unused_result
warning reported by Stephen Rothwell
I have some bones to gnaw. Not specific to this patch ;)
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:54:26 +0200
<michael.hennerich@...log.com> wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] video: backlight: adp8870: Fix warn_unused_result warning reported by Stephen Rothwell
Lots of people are doing this "video: backlight: adp8870:" thing
lately. And it's good, but why not just use
"drivers/video/backlight/adp8860_bl.c" to identify the affected
susbsytem/file/etc? It's simple and uniform. It's not always the
appropriate thing to do, but replacing the /'s with ": " seems rather
random and pointless.
Secondly, no, the point of this patch is not to fix a
warn_unused_result() warning! The patch actually fixes a bug: the code
wasn't checking the strict_strtoul() return value. The warning is
simply what alerted us to the bug.
So I renamed this patch to
drivers/video/backlight/adp8860_bl.c: check strict_strtoul() return value
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists