[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2wroynj4t.fsf@igel.home>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:32:18 +0100
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Sam Creasey <sammy@...my.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] m68k/sun3: Kill pte_unmap() warnings
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> writes:
> Which one is preferable?
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Since commit 31c911329e048b715a1dfeaaf617be9430fd7f4e ("mm: check the argument
> of kunmap on architectures without highmem"), we get lots of warnings like
>
> arch/m68k/kernel/sys_m68k.c:508: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘kunmap’ from incompatible pointer type
>
> As m68k doesn't support highmem anyway, open code the calls to kmap() and
> kunmap() (the latter is a no-op) to kill the warnings.
I prefer this one, it matches all architectures without CONFIG_HIGHPTE.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...ux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists