linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] AMD Microcode: Prefer vzalloc() over calls to vmalloc()+memset()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101101212747.GA23907@liondog.tnic>
Date:	Mon, 1 Nov 2010 22:27:47 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@....com>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
	amd64-microcode@...64.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMD Microcode: Prefer vzalloc() over calls to
 vmalloc()+memset()

On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:23:23PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback I'll prepare a new version of the patch 
> incorporating it, then resend it. 
> 
> One thing I'm not entirely sure about though is how to credit you with 
> your improment to my original patch. Would I simply prepend
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> 
> or should I leave just my own Signed-off-by: and then mention you in the 
> changelog part of the mail or? 

How very considerate of you, but no need. Simply put your SOB in and
I'll ack it.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/