[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinPDYSV0Xh27AiQNzytsifqXm4Mxa_KwYG8iNb+@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:06:11 +0100
From: Audun Hoem <audun.hoem@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: gregkh <gregkh@...e.de>, devel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: frontier: alphatrack: fixed coding style issues
On 11/2/10, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 16:31 +0100, Audun Hoem wrote:
>> Cleaned up a macro definition and another simple style warning.
>> Signed-off-by: Audun Hoem <audun.hoem@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c | 9 ++++++---
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c
>> b/drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c
>> index ef7fbf8..6e3bd73 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/frontier/alphatrack.c
>> @@ -88,8 +88,11 @@ MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE("Frontier Designs Alphatrack
>> Control Surface");
>> static int debug = ALPHATRACK_DEBUG;
>>
>> /* Use our own dbg macro */
>> -#define dbg_info(dev, format, arg...) do \
>> - { if (debug) dev_info(dev , format , ## arg); } while (0)
>> +#define dbg_info(dev, format, arg...) \
>> +do { \
>> + if (debug) \
>> + dev_info(dev , format , ## arg); \
>
> There is no need for the spaces before commas.
>
> gcc 2.xx required a space before a comma with a trailing ##arg,
> but that compiler version is no longer supported.
>
> This should be:
> dev_info(dev, format, ##arg);
>
> though I think using dev_dbg and getting rid of the dbg_info
> macro is better.
>
I was planning to remove the patch in a later patch, which I at the
time thought was necessary, but in light of this checkpatch fault, I
guess I could have just pushed it in this one.
>> +} while (0)
>>
>> #define alphatrack_ocmd_info(dev, cmd, format, arg...)
>>
>> @@ -769,7 +772,7 @@ static int usb_alphatrack_probe(struct usb_interface
>> *intf,
>> }
>>
>> dev->write_buffer =
>> - kmalloc(sizeof(struct alphatrack_ocmd) * true_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + kmalloc(sizeof(struct alphatrack_ocmd) *true_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Not an improvement.
>
> If checkpatch warns about this, it's a checkpatch defect.
Interesting. Apparently it mistook the multiplication operator for the
unary * operator. May take a look at that perl script later.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists