[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35B17FE5076C7040809188FBE7913F983F847B52A2@SC1EXMB-MBCL.global.atheros.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 11:37:23 -0700
From: Vipin Mehta <Vipin.Mehta@...eros.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
driverdevel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: linux-next: Tree for October 29 (staging/ath6kl)
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 04:16:10PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:11:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
>
>
> drivers/staging/ath6kl/hif/sdio/linux_sdio/src/hif_scatter.c:288: error: 'struct mmc_host' has no member named 'max_hw_segs'
> drivers/staging/ath6kl/hif/sdio/linux_sdio/src/hif_scatter.c:289: error: 'struct mmc_host' has no member named 'max_hw_segs'
Looks like it was caused by:
a36274e0184193e393fb82957925c3981a6b0477
mmc: Remove distinction between hw and phys segments
and it's a simple fix. I'll do it after -rc1 is out as I'm on my way to
Boston now...
I had submitted a patch for this a few weeks back and the required
changes were present in the tag next-20101028. They somehow got
reverted back in the tag next-20101029. Both Greg and Stephen
should have the original patch but I can send it again if it helps.
(Sorry my mutt is acting up so sending it through Outlook)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists