[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101102200228.GA2631@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:02:28 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Vipin Mehta <Vipin.Mehta@...eros.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
driverdevel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 29 (staging/ath6kl)
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 11:37:23AM -0700, Vipin Mehta wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 04:16:10PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:11:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > drivers/staging/ath6kl/hif/sdio/linux_sdio/src/hif_scatter.c:288: error: 'struct mmc_host' has no member named 'max_hw_segs'
> > drivers/staging/ath6kl/hif/sdio/linux_sdio/src/hif_scatter.c:289: error: 'struct mmc_host' has no member named 'max_hw_segs'
>
> Looks like it was caused by:
> a36274e0184193e393fb82957925c3981a6b0477
>
> mmc: Remove distinction between hw and phys segments
>
>
> and it's a simple fix. I'll do it after -rc1 is out as I'm on my way to
> Boston now...
>
> I had submitted a patch for this a few weeks back and the required
> changes were present in the tag next-20101028. They somehow got
> reverted back in the tag next-20101029. Both Greg and Stephen
> should have the original patch but I can send it again if it helps.
>
> (Sorry my mutt is acting up so sending it through Outlook)
Yes, sorry, I have this in my queue, I too am busy in Boston :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists