[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CD17588.1090601@euromail.se>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:45:28 +0100
From: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
To: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
CC: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/8] hwmon: applesmc: Relax the severity
of device init failure
On 11/02/2010 05:03 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 03:50:27AM -0400, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> The device init is used to reset the accelerometer. Failure to reset
>> is not severe enough to stop loading the module or to resume from
>> hibernation. This patch relaxes failure to a warning and drops
>> output in case of success.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c | 24 ++----------------------
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
>> index d7a5b75..375e464 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
>> @@ -458,21 +458,8 @@ static int applesmc_device_init(void)
>> mutex_lock(&applesmc_lock);
>>
> Since the callers of applesmc_device_init() now all don't check the return value,
> it might make sense to declare it as void and not bother returning an error.
>
> Otherwise looks good.
Sounds good, will change.
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists