lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:43:15 +0100
From:	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
To:	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
CC:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 0/8] hwmon: applesmc: Dynamic configuration
 rewrite

On 11/03/2010 02:48 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 03:50:26AM -0400, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> The amount of machines supported by this driver has increased rapidly
>> over the past years, and the detailed driver support of the many
>> flavors is quickly becoming a problem.
>>
>> This patchset introduces dynamic configuration by making the SMC
>> register set efficiently searchable, and fixes a number of outstanding
>> issues:
>>
>> * Support for all new models since MacbookPro 6.
>> * Support for variable number of cpu sensors in the MacPros.
>> * Handles the odd temperature sensor types found on new models.
>> * Fixes minor read problems on many intermediate models.
>>
>> The first patch is preparatory. The second patch adds the register
>> lookup cache. The third patch adds the dynamic temperature files, and
>> the fourth implements a new temperature register format. The fifth
>> patch makes the remaining features dynamically configured, and the
>> sixth patch sets up the fans dynamically. The seventh patch is purely
>> janitory, and the last patch updates the copyright.
>>
>> As a side-effect, the file is reduced by almost five hundred lines.
>>
> Henrik,
> 
> since you applied your changes on top of Joe's pr_fmt patch, I assume
> that you Ack that patch. Is that a correct assumption ?
> 
> I know you sent an Ack earlier, but it was "except for comments already made",
> so this is just for clarification.


Yeah, I'm good with those changes. As far as I understand, the issue was
regarding the extra define at the top, not the changes per se. I can certainly
live with that extra line until something better comes along.

Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ