lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:48:33 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
To:	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
CC:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 0/8] hwmon: applesmc: Dynamic
 configuration rewrite

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 03:50:26AM -0400, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> The amount of machines supported by this driver has increased rapidly
> over the past years, and the detailed driver support of the many
> flavors is quickly becoming a problem.
> 
> This patchset introduces dynamic configuration by making the SMC
> register set efficiently searchable, and fixes a number of outstanding
> issues:
> 
> * Support for all new models since MacbookPro 6.
> * Support for variable number of cpu sensors in the MacPros.
> * Handles the odd temperature sensor types found on new models.
> * Fixes minor read problems on many intermediate models.
> 
> The first patch is preparatory. The second patch adds the register
> lookup cache. The third patch adds the dynamic temperature files, and
> the fourth implements a new temperature register format. The fifth
> patch makes the remaining features dynamically configured, and the
> sixth patch sets up the fans dynamically. The seventh patch is purely
> janitory, and the last patch updates the copyright.
> 
> As a side-effect, the file is reduced by almost five hundred lines.
> 
Henrik,

since you applied your changes on top of Joe's pr_fmt patch, I assume
that you Ack that patch. Is that a correct assumption ?

I know you sent an Ack earlier, but it was "except for comments already made",
so this is just for clarification.

Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ