[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288753462.7326.20.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:04:22 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
Subject: Re: lessen the impact of a deprecated warning in hugetlbfs
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:06 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> WARN_ONCE is a bit strong for a deprecation warning, given that it spews a
> huge backtrace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
>
> --- linux-2.6.36.noarch/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c~ 2010-11-02 14:01:19.489289082 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.36.noarch/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c 2010-11-02 14:02:19.947986439 -0400
> @@ -915,8 +915,7 @@ struct file *hugetlb_file_setup(const ch
> if (creat_flags == HUGETLB_SHMFS_INODE && !can_do_hugetlb_shm()) {
> *user = current_user();
> if (user_shm_lock(size, *user)) {
> - WARN_ONCE(1,
> - "Using mlock ulimits for SHM_HUGETLB deprecated\n");
> + printk_once("Using mlock ulimits for SHM_HUGETLB deprecated\n");
Please add a KERN_NOTICE or similar.
The grammar could be improved via "is deprecated"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists