[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288820882.10236.35.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:48:02 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Damian Varayud <davarayud@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, harmonco@...r.orst.edu, sam.j.richardson@...il.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Staging: comedi: fix brace coding style issue in
ni_tio.c This is a patch to the ni_tio.c file that fixes up a brace,
indentation and overlines warning found by the checkpatch.pl tool
Signed-off-by: Varayud Damian Alfredo <davarayud@...il.com>
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 18:19 -0300, Damian Varayud wrote:
> ---
> drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_tio.c | 154 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_tio.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_tio.c
> index a9bb6b1..dd3db48 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_tio.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_tio.c
> @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Comedi support for NI general-purpose counters");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> static inline enum Gi_Counting_Mode_Reg_Bits Gi_Alternate_Sync_Bit(enum
> - ni_gpct_variant
> - variant)
> + ni_gpct_variant
> + variant)
Hi Damian.
This isn't an improvement.
It'd be better as:
static inline enum Gi_Counting_Mode_Reg_Bits
Gi_Alternate_Sync_Bit(enum ni_gpct_variant variant)
> @@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ static inline enum Gi_Counting_Mode_Reg_Bits Gi_Prescale_X8_Bit(enum
> }
>
> static inline enum Gi_Counting_Mode_Reg_Bits Gi_HW_Arm_Select_Mask(enum
> - ni_gpct_variant
> - variant)
> + ni_gpct_variant
> + variant)
here too
[]
> @@ -291,21 +296,22 @@ static void __exit ni_tio_cleanup_module(void)
>
> module_exit(ni_tio_cleanup_module);
>
> -struct ni_gpct_device *ni_gpct_device_construct(struct comedi_device *dev,
> - void (*write_register) (struct
> - ni_gpct
> - *
> - counter,
> - unsigned
> - bits,
> - enum
> - ni_gpct_register
> - reg),
> - unsigned (*read_register)
> - (struct ni_gpct *counter,
> - enum ni_gpct_register reg),
> - enum ni_gpct_variant variant,
> - unsigned num_counters)
> +struct ni_gpct_device *ni_gpct_device_construct
> + (struct comedi_device *dev,
> + void (*write_register) (struct
> + ni_gpct
> + *
> + counter,
> + unsigned
> + bits,
> + enum
> + ni_gpct_register
> + reg),
> + unsigned (*read_register)
> + (struct ni_gpct *counter,
> + enum ni_gpct_register reg),
> + enum ni_gpct_variant variant,
> + unsigned num_counters)
And this is just plain ugly.
How about:
struct ni_gpct_device *
ni_gpct_device_construct(struct comedi_device *dev,
void (*write_register)(struct ni_gpct *counter,
unsigned bit,
enum ni_gpct_register reg),
unsigned (*read__register)(struct ni_gpct *counter,
enum ni_gpct_variant variant,
unsigned num_counters))
Please try to use some taste in ignoring checkpatch output
when appropriate. 80 columns isn't dicta.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists