[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1011041039450.2522-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:41:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
cc: pali.rohar@...il.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] OHCI: Fix for regression in 2.6.37-rc1 since commit
3df7169e7
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 11/03/2010 04:04 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> > This patch is definitely wrong -- it defeats the entire purpose of
> > rewriting the control register! That write was added _specifically_ to
> > put the controller into reset, i.e., to change the functional state.
> >
> > Furthermore, the write does the same thing as ohci_hcd.c does in its
> > ohci_usb_reset() routine. Regardless, ohci_run() does a complete host
> > controller reset, which should override anything done in pci-quirks.c.
> > Perhaps _that_ routine needs some attention.
>
> It is looking as if your patch is exposing a different bug. When I disable the
> write in pci_quirks leaving the controllers in OPER or RESUME mode, then
> ohci_run() is not called. I'm still trying to find out why.
Is your OHCI controller attached via PCI? If it is, I don't see how
ohci_pci_start() can avoid calling ohci_run().
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists