[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288899002.21823.3.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:30:02 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay()
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 14:19 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> +
> +static void (*delay_fn)(unsigned long) = delay_loop;
> +
> +void set_delay_fn(void (*fn)(unsigned long))
> +{
> + delay_fn = fn;
> +}
This needs to be a static inline in the header file.
> +/*
> + * loops = usecs * HZ * loops_per_jiffy / 1000000
> + */
> +void __delay(unsigned long loops)
> +{
> + delay_fn(loops);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
Can we make this static inline also? I'm sure about the module issues..
Daniel
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists