[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CD31E67.60107@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:58:15 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay()
On 11/04/2010 12:30 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 14:19 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> +
>> +static void (*delay_fn)(unsigned long) = delay_loop;
>> +
>> +void set_delay_fn(void (*fn)(unsigned long))
>> +{
>> + delay_fn = fn;
>> +}
>
> This needs to be a static inline in the header file.
Wouldn't that mean delay_fn needs to be exposed in the header file too?
I like the fact that it's static and scoped to this file.
>> +/*
>> + * loops = usecs * HZ * loops_per_jiffy / 1000000
>> + */
>> +void __delay(unsigned long loops)
>> +{
>> + delay_fn(loops);
>> +}
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
>
> Can we make this static inline also? I'm sure about the module issues..
Do you mean in the header file or in this file?
I think it won't work because there actually needs to be a __delay
symbol and it can't just be inlined away at all the call sites.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists