linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] X86: Cleanup idle= internal variables by getting rid of idle_halt idle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 5 Nov 2010 11:24:49 +0100
From:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	stable@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86: Cleanup idle= internal variables by getting rid of idle_halt idle_nomwait

Hi Len,

On Wednesday 03 November 2010 17:06:14 Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 November 2010 07:33:54 Len Brown wrote:
...
> > That function and all these idle workaround flags
> > need to be re-whacked.
> Whatabout this (compile tested (on x86_64/ia64)).
> Adding lkml as this affects x86 core code.
as this mostly affects intel_idle and acpi processor driver,
can you apply this one to your acpi test branch if you are
ok with it.

Thanks,

     Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/