[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1101120120370.19140@x980>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:22:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
stable@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86: Cleanup idle= internal variables by getting rid of
idle_halt idle_nomwait
> > > That function and all these idle workaround flags
> > > need to be re-whacked.
> > Whatabout this (compile tested (on x86_64/ia64)).
> > Adding lkml as this affects x86 core code.
> as this mostly affects intel_idle and acpi processor driver,
> can you apply this one to your acpi test branch if you are
> ok with it.
Looks good to me, Thomas, thanks for the follow-up.
I don't think it needed for -stable, but it is a good cleanup
for upstream.
applied to idle-test.
thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists