[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1011072158211.26247@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:04:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] UWB: Return UWB_RSV_ALLOC_NOT_FOUND rather than crashing on
NULL dereference if kzalloc fails
Hi,
Crashing on a null pointer deref is never a nice thing to do. It seems to
me that it's better to simply return UWB_RSV_ALLOC_NOT_FOUND if kzalloc()
fails in uwb_rsv_find_best_allocation().
I may be wrong since I have no way to test this (except compile test) and
this is unknown code to me, so please review carefully.
Please CC me on replies.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
---
allocator.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/uwb/allocator.c b/drivers/uwb/allocator.c
index 436e4f7..e45e673 100644
--- a/drivers/uwb/allocator.c
+++ b/drivers/uwb/allocator.c
@@ -326,7 +326,8 @@ int uwb_rsv_find_best_allocation(struct uwb_rsv *rsv, struct uwb_mas_bm *availab
int bit_index;
ai = kzalloc(sizeof(struct uwb_rsv_alloc_info), GFP_KERNEL);
-
+ if (!ai)
+ return UWB_RSV_ALLOC_NOT_FOUND;
ai->min_mas = rsv->min_mas;
ai->max_mas = rsv->max_mas;
ai->max_interval = rsv->max_interval;
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists