[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101107212045.GC13175@lenovo>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 00:20:45 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix apic.h unused but set warnings
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 08:53:26PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> index 286de34..9c4e06b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> @@ -141,12 +141,12 @@ static inline void native_apic_msr_write(u32 reg, u32 v)
>
> static inline u32 native_apic_msr_read(u32 reg)
> {
> - u32 low, high;
> + u32 low;
>
> if (reg == APIC_DFR)
> return -1;
>
> - rdmsr(APIC_BASE_MSR + (reg >> 4), low, high);
> + rdmsrl(APIC_BASE_MSR + (reg >> 4), low);
> return low;
> }
At least the former code _didn't_ hide the details of which
part of 'long long' value we need. Would not
u64 val;
rdmsrl(APIC_BASE_MSR + (reg >> 4), val);
return (u32)val;
be more clear?
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists