lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 00:20:45 +0300
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix apic.h unused but set warnings

On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 08:53:26PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
... 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> index 286de34..9c4e06b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> @@ -141,12 +141,12 @@ static inline void native_apic_msr_write(u32 reg, u32 v)
>  
>  static inline u32 native_apic_msr_read(u32 reg)
>  {
> -	u32 low, high;
> +	u32 low;
>  
>  	if (reg == APIC_DFR)
>  		return -1;
>  
> -	rdmsr(APIC_BASE_MSR + (reg >> 4), low, high);
> +	rdmsrl(APIC_BASE_MSR + (reg >> 4), low);
>  	return low;
>  }

 At least the former code _didn't_ hide the details of which
part of 'long long' value we need. Would not

 u64 val;
 rdmsrl(APIC_BASE_MSR + (reg >> 4), val);
 return (u32)val;

be more clear?

 Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ