linux-kernel - Re: [RFCv3 00/21] TCM Core and TCM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1289253869.27226.75.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
Date:	Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:04:29 -0800
From:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
	Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv3 00/21] TCM Core and TCM_Loop patches for v2.6.37

On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 16:48 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:20:07PM -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > Hmmm, it is my understanding that seq_file is currently not available
> > for configfs.  Also, we never going to expect these particular calls to
> > return anything close to PAGE_SIZE, so I am not sure how much of an
> > issue this really is.
> 
> Seq_file is avaible for anything where you can plug in file_operations.
> If configfs doesn't allow plugging in file_operations that's a serious
> deficit.  If you need less than a page of data single_open provides a
> simplified version of seq_file with a similar but much simpler API.

Hmmm, I recall asking Joel about this at some point back in 2008 and
back then I believe configfs was still limited to a PAGE_SIZE.

Joel, any comments here on the usage of seq_file() w/ configfs..?

> 
> > >  - the set_configfs_dev_params method implementation contains some
> > >    rather nast parsing code.  They look like they really should use
> > >    the parser.h helpers we use for mount option parsing.
> > 
> > <nod>  This code current expects the the incoming buffer to be in the
> > form of 'key0=value0,key1=value1,key2=value2' etc.   Assuming that
> > parser.h code can handle the comma seperated values, I will look at
> > getting these converted as well.
> 
> That's exactly how mount options work.
> 

<nod>  Ok, I will get this code converted to use parser.h.

--nab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/