linux-kernel - [PATCH] ioprio: rcu_read_lock/unlock protect find_task_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:21:24 +0200
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: [PATCH] ioprio: rcu_read_lock/unlock protect find_task_by_vpid call
 (V2)

Commit 4221a9918e38b7494cee341dda7b7b4bb8c04bde "Add RCU check for
find_task_by_vpid()" introduced rcu_lockdep_assert to find_task_by_pid_ns.
Assertion failed in sys_ioprio_get. The patch is fixing assertion
failure in ioprio_set as well.

 kernel/pid.c:419 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!

 stack backtrace:
 Pid: 4254, comm: iotop Not tainted
 Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff810656f2>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xaa/0xb2
 [<ffffffff81053c67>] find_task_by_pid_ns+0x4f/0x68
 [<ffffffff81053c9d>] find_task_by_vpid+0x1d/0x1f
 [<ffffffff811104e2>] sys_ioprio_get+0x50/0x2da
 [<ffffffff81002182>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
                     
V2: rcu critical section expanded according to comment by Paul E. McKenne:
| Looking over the patch again, the scope of the RCU read-side critical
| section needs to expand to cover the use of the pointer as well as the
| call to find_task_by_vpid().
                                                                

Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>

---

diff --git a/fs/ioprio.c b/fs/ioprio.c
index 748cfb9..64cd50b 100644
--- a/fs/ioprio.c
+++ b/fs/ioprio.c
@@ -111,12 +111,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(ioprio_set, int, which, int, who, int, ioprio)
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	switch (which) {
 		case IOPRIO_WHO_PROCESS:
+			rcu_read_lock();
 			if (!who)
 				p = current;
 			else
 				p = find_task_by_vpid(who);
 			if (p)
 				ret = set_task_ioprio(p, ioprio);
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 			break;
 		case IOPRIO_WHO_PGRP:
 			if (!who)
@@ -200,12 +202,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(ioprio_get, int, which, int, who)
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	switch (which) {
 		case IOPRIO_WHO_PROCESS:
+			rcu_read_lock();
 			if (!who)
 				p = current;
 			else
 				p = find_task_by_vpid(who);
 			if (p)
 				ret = get_task_ioprio(p);
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 			break;
 		case IOPRIO_WHO_PGRP:
 			if (!who)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/