linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] netoops support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101109042535.GB5220@cr0.nay.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:25:35 +0800
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>, simon.kagstrom@...insight.net,
	davem@...emloft.net, nhorman@...driver.com,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, adurbin@...gle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chavey@...gle.com,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] netoops support

On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:28:26AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com> writes:
>
>I'm still not fully convinced this needs to be a fully separate
>mechanism from netconsole.  It seems a lot of work to implement
>basically log level.
>
>Maybe netconsole could be patched to support only dumping KERN_EMERG?
>

I tend to agree, IMHO, we can introduce another parameter like "oops_only"
to netconsole.


>But I guess the structured logging has some advantages, although
>there have been certainly oops parsers (e.g. kerneloops.org) without it.
>

+1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/