[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101110183940.GA15089@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:39:40 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs, sysfs: Change sysfs_pathname function prototype.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:53:37AM +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> >
> > If it's really not used then why would marking it inline help out any?
> > Shouldn't we just delete the function instead?
> >
> As far as I can see, its been called recursively and also from
> sysfs_add_one. Am I missing anything?
If so, then what is the compiler warning that is being generated that
you are trying to resolve?
totally confused,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists