linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the staging.current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101110184029.GC15089@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:40:29 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the
	staging.current tree

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 01:24:20PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in
> drivers/staging/bcm/Bcmchar.c between commit
> eccbf04a904fc99c54ab37c29a2a4dedcec66e33 ("Staging: bcm: use get_user()
> to access user pointers") from the staging.current tree and commit
> ada692b09f4707a8e06b087b1546d9f5b3f2d37d ("beceem: fix character device
> ioctl") from the staging tree.
> 
> I just assumed that the latter supercedes the former and so used the
> staging version of the file.  I may well be wrong in this.

That sounds correct, I'll handle the merge when the patches go to Linus.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/