[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101112102748.GA8020@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:27:49 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu, acme@...hat.com,
eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Add support for extra parameters for raw
events
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:37:38PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 21:12 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Also, I think we can use the same mechanism to program the
> > > PEBS-load-latency MSR, right?
> >
> > I haven't looked at that, but if it's a per core resource
> > the infrastructure can be reused at least.
>
> Can't remember if the load-latency msr is per-core, but its an extra reg
> that needs to be set.
Ok. I guess it shouldn't be too hard to add.
Load-latency is pretty useful too.
>
> The nhm/wsm LBR config msr is per-core though, so that could use your
> infrastructure too.
Stephane mentioned that too. Not right now, but perhaps later I'll
look at using this.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists