[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101112.131936.191390015.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:19:36 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, cypher.w@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 V2] igmp: RCU conversion of in_dev->mc_list
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:46:50 +0100
> [PATCH net-next-2.6 V2] igmp: RCU conversion of in_dev->mc_list
>
> in_dev->mc_list is protected by one rwlock (in_dev->mc_list_lock).
>
> This can easily be converted to a RCU protection.
>
> Writers hold RTNL, so mc_list_lock is removed, not replaced by a
> spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
This looks good to me, so I've applied it to net-next-2.6
We have enough time there to fix any fallout or revert if
necessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists