[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <y0mlj4yw711.fsf@fche.csb>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:45:14 -0500
From: fche@...hat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: "Sylvain GENEVES" <Sylvain.Geneves@...ialpes.fr>
Cc: "oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net" <oprofile-list@...ts.sf.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Oprofile bug ?
"Sylvain GENEVES" <Sylvain.Geneves@...ialpes.fr> writes:
> [...]
> I'm encountering unexpected behaviour with OProfile when the profiled
> system is under heavy load : "BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
> at 0000000000004cc3" (full console message is attached).
> [...]
> Anyone has any idea on what is happening ?
Just glancing at that oops & my local random kernel build, it appears
as though this part of arch/x86/kernel/time.c:profile_pc is failing:
unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long pc = instruction_pointer(regs);
if (!user_mode_vm(regs) && in_lock_functions(pc)) {
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
return *(unsigned long *)(regs->bp + sizeof(long));
#else
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[...]
regs->bp must have been 0x4cbb, which this code turns into an
unchecked dereferences at 0x4cbb+8 = 0x4cc3. I don't have a theory
as to why regs->bp should have that value in it, but the kernel
should probably use probe_kernel_read() or somesuch to validate the
value before dereferencing it.
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists