[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289644224.2084.521.camel@laptop>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 11:30:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG 2.6.27-rc1] find_busiest_group() LOCKUP
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 16:40 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > Will try and figure out how the heck that's happening, Ingo any clue?
>
> It's back to normal on 2.6.37-rc1 when reverting commit 50f2d7f682f9
> ("x86, numa: Assign CPUs to nodes in round-robin manner on fake NUMA").
>
> The interesting part is, the commit was introduced in
> 2.6.36-rc7..2.6.36, however 2.6.36 boots OK, while 2.6.37-rc1 panics.
Argh, that commit again..
Does this fix it: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/12/8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists