[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289833458.12418.601.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:04:18 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
mingo@...e.hu, lwoodman@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] tracing,mm - add kernel pagefault tracepoint for
x86 & x86_64
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:54 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:06:33PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > For tracing the whole page fault me think it's better to have
> > a generalized exception tracer with a filter on page fault.
>
>
> You're right. A tracepoint in handle_mm_fault() would be perhaps
> better. It should catch most tracepoints the users are interested
> in. On the other hand we may miss part of the page fault
> latency, like the mmap_sem contention. This can be measured using
> lock events though.
>
> But I'm probably missing other important things.
I would have the general exception handler as a tracepoint that would
have a "stable tracepoint" hook to it. That is, when enabling it as a
infield debugging tracepoint, we would get the "raw tracepoint", but the
stable tracepoint would massage it into different general types of
exceptions, and the code there would do the filtering.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists