linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 1/7] taskstats: Add new taskstats command TASKSTATS_CMD_ATTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1289837178.2109.504.camel@laptop>
Date:	Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:06:18 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Shailabh Nagar <nagar1234@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	John stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 1/7] taskstats: Add new taskstats command
 TASKSTATS_CMD_ATTR_PIDS

On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 16:53 +0100, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> Hello Peter,
> 
> On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 20:20 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 18:03 +0100, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > > As clock for 'now' and 'time' the sched_clock() function is used and the patch
> > 
> > > +       preempt_disable();
> > > +       stats->time_ns = sched_clock();
> > > +       preempt_enable();
> > 
> > > +       task_snap_time = sched_clock();
> > 
> > That's just plain broken...
> 
> What exactly do you mean? Do you mean that we should not use
> sched_clock() in general or that it is called twice?

That you should not use sched_clock(), and if you do (you really
shouldn't) you should have disabled IRQs around it.

> > 
> > 
> > > +       t->sched_info.last_depart = task_rq(t)->clock;
> > 
> > Are you sure you don't mean task_rq(t)->clock_task ?
> 
> Maybe... I want to save in "last_depart" a sched_clock() timestamp that
> is as precise as possible.
> 
> We use "last_depart" for the TASKSTATS_CMD_ATTR_PIDS command to find out
> which tasks have been running on a CPU since the last taskstats
> snapshot. We return all tasks where last_depart > MIN(stats->time_ns for
> all tasks of last snapshot).

What does last departed mean? That is what timeline are you counting in?
Do you want time as tasks see it, or time as your wallclock sees it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/