lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:30:14 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/20] ARM: LPAE: Introduce L_PTE_NOEXEC and
	L_PTE_NOWRITE

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 06:00:25PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> The LPAE page table format needs to explicitly disable execution or
> write permissions on a page by setting the corresponding bits (similar
> to the classic page table format with Access Flag enabled). This patch
> introduces null definitions for the 2-level format and the actual noexec
> and nowrite bits for the LPAE format. It also changes several PTE
> maintenance macros and masks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-2level.h |    2 +
>  arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h        |   44 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  arch/arm/mm/mmu.c                     |    6 ++--
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-2level.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-2level.h
> index 36bdef7..4e21166 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-2level.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-2level.h
> @@ -128,6 +128,8 @@
>  #define L_PTE_USER		(1 << 8)
>  #define L_PTE_EXEC		(1 << 9)
>  #define L_PTE_SHARED		(1 << 10)	/* shared(v6), coherent(xsc3) */
> +#define L_PTE_NOEXEC		(0)
> +#define L_PTE_NOWRITE		(0)

Let's not make this more complicated than it has to be.  If we need the
inverse of WRITE and EXEC, then that's what we should change everyone to,
not invent a new system to work along side the old system.

We're already inverting the write bit for the vast majority of processors,
and exec has always been inverted by the ARMv6 and v7 code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ