[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101115213444.GA25705@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:34:44 -0500
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: jaxboe@...ionio.com
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: rename trace_block_remap to
trace_block_bio_remap
On Mon, Nov 15 2010 at 3:58pm -0500,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> This may have slipped through while you were traveling?
>
> Patch is also available here:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/300552/
>
> Not sure if this change is concerning on a kABI level?
To be clear: that concern/question was prompted from having taken a
quick glance at lwn's kernel summit "KS2010: ABI status for tracepoints"
coverage: http://lwn.net/Articles/412685/
But in that article it clearly states:
"there are to be no stable tracepoints in drivers or filesystems".
Not sure where that leaves tracepoints for the block layer. Anyway,
seems tracepoint kABI is likely a concern for the future (not the
immediate future).
So this change would be nice to get in before there is a new tracepoint
kABI-aware sheriff in town.
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists