lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289940156.28741.207.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date:	Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:42:36 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rfc: rewrite commit subject line for subsystem maintainer
 preference tool

On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 12:21 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:55:31 +0000 Mark Brown wrote:
> I don't know what you asked Joe to change, but asking someone to use
> the documented canonical patch format:
> <quote>
> The canonical patch subject line is:
>     Subject: [PATCH 001/123] subsystem: summary phrase
> </quote>
> should be fine.  And there is no need for printf-ish templates
> for this in MAINTAINERS either.

I've never read that before.  Learn something new etc...
It seems path prefixes aren't good nor even commonly used.

A review of kernel patch subjects:

$ git log --no-merges --pretty=oneline | \
	cut -f2- -d" " | cut -f1 -d: | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn

is interesting.  Here's the head:
   5007 x86
   3943 Staging
   3220 USB
   2790 sh
   2707 KVM
   2624 ARM
   2449 ALSA
   1571 Input
   1549 ASoC
   1470 iwlwifi
   1423 ACPI
   1397 mac80211
   1384 V4L/DVB
   1226 sched
   1200 Btrfs
   1184 powerpc
   1106 [NETFILTER]
   1080 MIPS
   1049 net
   1047 ide
   1014 drm/i915
    993 staging
    921 ath9k

Some subsystem maintainers like upper case, some mixed, some lower.
Some aren't consistent.  (Staging/staging)

It doesn't seem a rule can be pregenerated so maybe adding these
"C:" lines to MAINTAINERS has some value.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ