[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101116.124325.116396459.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:43:25 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: wg@...ndegger.com
Cc: tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com, andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com,
masa-korg@....okisemi.com, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
margie.foster@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
kok.howg.ewe@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com,
yong.y.wang@...el.com, chripell@...e.org, qi.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v4] can: Topcliff: PCH_CAN driver: Add
Flow control/Fix Endianess issue/Separate IF register/Enumerate LEC
macro/Move MSI processing/Use BIT(X)/Change Message Object index/Add
prefix PCH_
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:39:47 +0100
> Please take into account that this patch got accepted by accident
> (because the maintainer did not respond properly in time). At that time
> the driver was incomplete, not ready for mainline and did not even work
> properly. Therefore it makes little sense to debug or even bisec these
> changes. Just for that reason I made an exemption and added my
> "Acked-by". Hope you can share my arguments.
You don't put stupid on top of stupid and justify the latter using
the former.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists