lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101117105248.GV17801@esdhcp04058.research.nokia.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:52:48 +0200
From:	Mika Westerberg <ext-mika.1.westerberg@...ia.com>
To:	ext Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] proc/vmcore: allow archs to override
	vmcore_elf_check_arch()

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:50:42PM +0000, ext Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
[...]
> 
> So, as far as the above patch goes, I think it's sane, as it now
> allows architectures to deal with the 64-bit/32-bit ELF issues in the
> crash dump code in a more sane manner.

Russell,

Is it ok if I submit this patch (along with patches 2 and 3) to your patch
system as Andrew suggested, or do you prefer to merge it via some other tree?

Thanks,
MW
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ